Request to Amend Accountability Plan – Texas – NCLB Policy Letters to States
July 27, 2004
Honorable Shirley Neeley
Texas Education Agency
1701 North Congress
Austin, Texas 78701
Dear Commissioner Neeley:
I am writing in response to Texas’ request to amend its state accountability plan under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). Following our discussions with your staff, those changes that are aligned with NCLB are now included in an amended state accountability plan that Texas submitted to the Department on July 27, 2004. A list of the changes is enclosed with this letter. I am pleased to fully approve Texas’ amended plan, which we will post on the Department’s website.
If, over time, Texas makes changes to the accountability plan that has been approved, Texas must submit information about those changes to the Department for review and approval, as required by section 1111(f)(2) of Title I. Approval of Texas’ accountability plan is not also an approval of Texas’ standards and assessment system. As Texas makes changes in its standards and assessments to meet requirements under NCLB, Texas must submit information about those changes to the Department for peer review through the standards and assessment process.
Please also be aware that approval of Texas’ accountability plan for Title I, including the amendments approved above, does not indicate that the plan complies with Federal civil rights requirements, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
I hope that you have found the accountability plan amendment process effective for implementing a state accountability system that best serves the needs of Texas’ students and schools and that will lead to improving the academic achievement of all students. As evidenced by the diversity among state accountability plans and state consolidated applications, States have great flexibility in the design of their systems and implementation of particular NCLB provisions. If, as you implement your accountability plan, you find additional elements of your plan that you believe should be refined or amended for next school year to best serve the needs of your students and schools, I encourage you to explore all the areas of flexibility available to your State.
In addition to the flexibility available to States in the design and implementation of their accountability plans, I also encourage you and your districts to utilize the additional flexibility available for the administration and operation of NCLB programs. NCLB continued the flexibility available to States and districts under the 1994 reauthorization of the ESEA, including the ability to consolidate state and local administrative funds (sections 9201 and 9203), to operate schoolwide programs (section 1114), and to participate in the Education Flexibility Partnership Program ("Ed-Flex"). Additionally, NCLB created several new flexibility options for States and districts for the operation of federal programs. These new flexibility provisions include the State Flexibility Authority (sections 6141 through 6144), the Local Flexibility Demonstration program (sections 6151 through 6156), Transferability (sections 6121 through 6123), and the Rural Education Achievement program (sections 6201 through 6234). These flexibilities truly offer States and districts the ability to target federal resources to their unique and individual needs.
I am confident that Texas will continue to advance its efforts to hold schools and school districts accountable for the achievement of all students. I wish you well in your school improvement efforts. If I can be of any additional assistance to Texas in its efforts to implement other aspects of NCLB, please do not hesitate to call.
cc: Governor Rick Perry
Amendments to the Texas Accountability Plan
These statements are summaries of the amendments. For complete details, please refer to the Texas Accountability plan on the Department’s website: http://www.ed.govhttps://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/stateplans03/index.html
Participation Rate (Element 1.2)
Request: Texas will adopt the new flexibility regarding multi-year averaging of participation rate.
Multiple test administrations
Revision: Texas will include the cumulative results of the fall and spring administrations of the third grade reading achievement tests for AYP. Students who score proficient on either administration will be counted as proficient when calculating AYP. This will also be expanded to other grades and content areas when Texas implements its policy that students have to pass these assessments to be promoted to the next grade.
Revision: Texas will apply standard rounding rules to all aspects of AYP elements including performance targets, performance rates, participation target, and participation rates.
Small school AYP and Schools without tested grades (Element 1.2)
Revision: Texas offers several approaches for AYP determinations in schools that are small or have no students in the tested grades.
Alignment of State accountability ratings and AYP status (Element 1.1)
Revision: Texas proposes a system for integrating the state ratings with the AYP system. Texas will also better align the timing for AYP and state rating appeals.
Accountability for LEP students (Element 5.1)
Revision: Texas will include the flexibility that the Secretary’s letter of February 20, 2004 provides relative to limited English proficient students for accountability purposes.
Decision Letters on State Accountability Plans