Mississippi – Amendment to Accountability Plan – NCLB Policy Letters to States

May 28, 2004

Honorable Henry L. Johnson
Mississippi Department of Education
P. O. Box 771
Jackson, Mississippi 39205-0771

Dear Superintendent Johnson:

I am writing in response to Mississippi’s request to amend its state accountability plan under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB). Following our discussions with your staff, those changes that are aligned with NCLB are now included in an amended state accountability plan that Mississippi submitted to the Department on May 26, 2004. A list of the changes is enclosed with this letter. I am pleased to fully approve Mississippi’s amended plan, which we will post on the Department’s website. With respect to your letter dated April 6, 2004, we will continue our discussions with you regarding the request for additional flexibility in the use of alternate assessments.

If, over time, Mississippi makes changes to the accountability plan that has been approved, Mississippi must submit information about those changes to the Department for review and approval, as required by section 1111(f)(2) of Title I. Approval of Mississippi’s accountability plan is not also an approval of Mississippi’s standards and assessment system. As Mississippi makes changes in its standards and assessments to meet requirements under NCLB, Mississippi must submit information about those changes to the Department for peer review through the standards and assessment process.

Please also be aware that approval of Mississippi’s accountability plan for Title I, including the amendments approved above, does not indicate that the plan complies with Federal civil rights requirements, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, and requirements under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.

I hope that you have found the accountability plan amendment process effective for implementing a state accountability system that best serves the needs of Mississippi’s students and schools and that will lead to improving the academic achievement of all students. As evidenced by the diversity among state accountability plans and state consolidated applications, States have great flexibility in the design of their systems and implementation of particular NCLB provisions. If, as you implement your accountability plan, you find additional elements of your plan that you believe should be refined or amended for next school year to best serve the needs of your students and schools, I encourage you to explore all the areas of flexibility available to your State.

In addition to the flexibility available to States in the design and implementation of their accountability plans, I also encourage you and your districts to utilize the additional flexibility available for the administration and operation of NCLB programs. NCLB continued the flexibility available to States and districts under the 1994 reauthorization of the ESEA, including the ability to consolidate State and local administrative funds (sections 9201 and 9203), to operate schoolwide programs (section 1114), and to participate in the Education Flexibility Partnership Program (“Ed-Flex”). Additionally, NCLB created several new flexibility options for States and districts for the operation of federal programs. These new flexibility provisions include the State Flexibility Authority (sections 6141 through 6144), the Local Flexibility Demonstration program (sections 6151 through 6156), Transferability (sections 6121 through 6123), and the Rural Education Achievement program (sections 6201 through 6234). These flexibilities truly offer States and districts the ability to target federal resources to their unique and individual needs.

I am confident that Mississippi will continue to advance its efforts to hold schools and school districts accountable for the achievement of all students. I wish you well in your school improvement efforts. If I can be of any additional assistance to Mississippi in its efforts to implement other aspects of NCLB, please do not hesitate to call.


Raymond Simon
Assistant Secretary
Office of Elementary and Secondary Education


cc: Governor Haley Barbour


Amendments to the Mississippi Accountability Plan

These statements are summaries of the amendments. For complete details, please refer to the Mississippi Accountability plan on the Department’s website: http://www.ed.govhttps://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/stateplans03/index.html

Alternate assessments (Element 5.4)

Revision: Mississippi will be using the final regulation in the Federal Register issued December 9, 2003, concerning the 1.0% cap. Specifically, Mississippi will ensure that the “number of proficient and advanced scores based on the alternate achievement standards” does not exceed 1.0% of all students in the grades assessed at the State and LEA levels.

Assessment and Accountability for LEP students (Element 2.1, and 5.2)

Revision: Mississippi will include the flexibility that the Secretary’s letter of February 20, 2004 provides relative to limited English proficient students for assessment and accountability purposes.

Table of Contents Decision Letters on State Accountability Plans

Mississippi - Amendment to Accountability Plan - NCLB Policy Letters to States